Clarifying user intent
The user's message is in Chinese, sharing a statement about Inter's transfer priorities for defenders and goalkeepers. This seems like a news snippet, but there isn't a specific question asked. I’m thinking it’d be best to ask a clarifying question since they might want more details. I should recap what they said and inquire if they'd like a summary, context, source, or analysis, while keeping in mind my knowledge cutoff date.Assessing user needs for information
The instruction guides me to assume workspace-write and network-enabled conditions unless told otherwise. For current updates, I could ask the user if they want me to look something up. Since we're in Codex CLI and may need to navigate network restrictions, I should clarify what the user wants: a translation, summary, opinion, or squad analysis. I could give general context about Inter's lineup and coaching, focusing on defensive needs and goalkeeping options as of late 2024.Clarifying Inter's transfers
I'm trying to piece together the details about Inter's signings. Josep Martinez appears to have joined from Genoa in 2024 as a future goalkeeper option behind Sommer, who’s aging at 35. I could speculate about defender and goalkeeper needs due to the aging core, with players like Acerbi and Darmian also up there in age. It might be wise to keep this information general since specifics may be beyond my knowledge cutoff. I should ask the user if they want a target list or a summary while responding in Chinese to match their language.Analyzing Inter's needs
I want to provide a brief analysis for the user and ask how they’d like to proceed. I can mention a couple of names linked to Inter within my knowledge cutoff like Bento and Michele Di Gregorio but I should avoid any outdated mentions. I’ll highlight the risks of the current squad, focusing on the aging center-back and goalkeeping situation, and suggest some profiles they might want to consider without naming specific players. I'll also ask if they need a candidate list or details on contract prices.
看起来像罗马诺的转会线报：国米接下来两个转会窗的重点会放在后卫和门将。这个方向挺符合国米当前阵容结构的风险点：
- 中卫年龄结构偏大，右中卫与中路位置需要速度与对抗的更新迭代；左脚中卫也需要稳定替补层。
- 门将位置短中期要考虑接班与轮换，既要足够脚下出球，也要保持高位线后的防守覆盖。
操作思路通常是：
- 冬窗：补短板型（即战力或租借带买断），优先右中卫/轮换门将，控制成本。
- 夏窗：完成门将接班和核心中卫升级，匹配体系（出球+高位压迫），预留工资空间与摊销。 
需要我：
- 找到这条消息的原出处并核对细节？ 
- 按国米现阵型与预算，做“门将/中卫候选名单”（风格匹配、合同情况、估价与可操作性）？ 
- 做阵容测算：不同引援组合对首发与工资、摊销的影响对比？